成功案例

Essay代写案例-动物应该像人类一样被安乐死吗?

来源:原创| 作者:DissertationMaster| 时间:2020-09-10 14:23
      本文是一篇essay代写范文,题目为Should animals be euthanized as humans?本文主要讨论了动物是否应该像人类一样被安乐死。安乐死在需要动物帮助他们完成一些实验的人们中越来越普遍。确实,协助死亡绝不排除可能提供的最佳姑息治疗,而是融合了同情照顾和对患者自主权的尊重,最终使有尊严的死亡成为现实。
 
动物安乐死
 
 
Should animals be euthanized as humans?
 
      It is not uncommon that euthanasia is increasingly popular for people who need animals to help them to complete some experiments. It seems to be true that assisting death in no way precludes giving the best palliative care possible but rather integrates compassionate care and respect for the patient's autonomy and ultimately makes death with dignity a real option.
      安乐死对于那些需要动物帮助他们完成一些实验的人来说越来越受欢迎。似乎确实,协助死亡决不排除给予最好的姑息治疗,而是将同情心关怀和尊重病人自主性结合起来,最终使尊严地死亡成为一种真正的选择。
 
      Admittedly, this kind of death , to some extent, could reduce the pain of the animals if they are necessary in the animal experiments. However, why do not we think about the problem that why human are always killing animals and find a very appropriate cause for themselves to claim to the world that we are do something that is beneficial to the animals by killing themselves to do the animal experiments. People always say that we have tried our best to protect the animals and to make them comfortable when they have to be confronted with death because of human. So, why do not these people also try this way when they realized they are needed in some fields?
      诚然,这种死亡,在一定程度上可以减轻动物的痛苦,如果动物实验需要的话。然而,为什么我们不去思考为什么人类总是在杀戮动物,并为自己找到一个非常合适的理由来向世界宣称,我们是在做一些对动物有益的事情,自杀来做动物实验呢。人们总是说,我们尽了最大的努力保护动物,使它们在面对人类死亡时感到舒适。那么,当这些人意识到某些领域需要他们时,为什么不也尝试一下呢?
 
      That is to say, opposing euthanasia to palliative care neither reflects the Dutch reality that palliative medicine is incorporated within end-of-life care nor the place of the option of assisted death at the request of a patient within the overall spectrum of end-of-life care even though people always find a variety of reasons to beautify this action.
      也就是说,反对安乐死与姑息治疗既不反映荷兰的现实,即姑息医学被纳入临终关怀,也不反映在临终关怀的整体范围内,应病人的要求而选择协助死亡,尽管人们总是找到各种理由美化这种行为。
 
      Some people would like to say that people have the rights to die if they have no living wills. More interestingly, they would quote these words to prove they are right.” "The right of a competent, terminally ill person to avoid excruciating pain and embrace a timely and dignified death bears the sanction of history and is implicit in the concept of ordered liberty. The exercise of this right is as central to personal autonomy and bodily integrity as rights safeguarded by this Court's decisions relating to marriage, family relationships, procreation, contraception, child rearing and the refusal or termination of life-saving medical treatment”(Vacco,1996) .However, they might ignore a significant fact that it seems to be the right of people rather than animals. This is because it might be interesting that animal also would choose death when they are facing with the unfair treatment of their boss while working or with the discrimination resulting from the different status and salaries. Obviously, all these actions belongs to human rather than animals.
 
      We wish to take a strong stand against the separation and opposition between euthanasia and assisted suicide, on the one hand, and palliative care, on the other that such critics have implied even though the evidence for the emotional impact of assisted dying on physicians shows that euthanasia and assisted suicide are a far cry from being 'easier options for the caregiver' than palliative care, as some critics of practice have suggested. There is no 'either-or' with respect to these options (Kimsma, 2004). Every appropriate palliative option available must be discussed with the patient and, if reasonable, tried before a request for assisted death can be accepted.
In addition, laws should be established to against euthanasia and assisted suicide are in place to prevent abuse and to protect people from unscrupulous doctors and others. They are not, and never have been, intended to make anyone suffer.
 
      In conclusion, it is not fair for animals to die with euthanasia even though it seems that everything is appropriate for human. However, animals are not human and they should not be treated as human because of the different nature and qualities. Therefore, weather we should kill the animals with euthanasia should be thought over and over again.
来源声明:本文章系DissertationMaster编辑原创或采编整理,如需转载请注明来自DissertationMaster。以上内容部分(包含图片、文字)来源于网络,格式和内容仅供留学生参考学习,禁止抄袭。如有侵权,请及时与本站客服联系,我们将在第一时间删除。
本文关键词:

Essay代写案例

免责声明

非常感谢您访问我们的网站。在您使用本网站之前,请您仔细阅读本声明的所有条款。

1、本站部分内容来源自网络,涉及到的部分文章和图片版权属于原作者,本站转载仅供大家学习和交流,切勿用于任何商业活动。

2、本站源码来自第三方网站建设平台,如有侵犯知识产权请及时我们联系。

3、本声明未涉及的问题参见国家有关法律法规,当本声明与国家法律法规冲突时,以国家法律法规为准。

4、如果侵害了您的合法权益,请您及时与我们,我们会在第一时间删除相关内容!

联系方式:18628020995
电子邮件:947017031@qq.com

免责声明

非常感谢您访问我们的网站。在您使用本网站之前,请您仔细阅读本声明的所有条款。

1、本站部分内容来源自网络,涉及到的部分文章和图片版权属于原作者,本站转载仅供大家学习和交流,切勿用于任何商业活动。

2、本站源码来自第三方网站建设平台,如有侵犯知识产权请及时我们联系。

3、本声明未涉及的问题参见国家有关法律法规,当本声明与国家法律法规冲突时,以国家法律法规为准。

4、如果侵害了您的合法权益,请您及时与我们,我们会在第一时间删除相关内容!

联系方式:18628020995
电子邮件:947017031@qq.com